MSF Calls for Replication and Expansion of Successful Efforts to Reduce AIDS Drug Prices
By producing quality generic medicines, countries such as Brazil have made AIDS drugs affordable to tens of thousands of people who would otherwise go untreated because they could not afford branded products. Through an analysis of ten essential drugs for HIV/AIDS in 8 countries, the report, entitled ‘HIV/AIDS Medicines Pricing’, shows how the minimum price for AIDS drugs in the developing countries studied is on average 82% less than in the US. This difference has not resulted from discounts by multinational companies, but rather from generic competition and initiatives by national governments.
In parallel to the efforts of individual countries, the report also recommends the UN, led by UNAIDS, should develop a system to facilitate the bulk purchasing of AIDS drugs by putting out a tender to multinational pharmaceutical drug companies and local and international generic producers.
“We are using antiretroviral treatment in our program here in South Africa to reduce the transmission of HIV to newborns, so we know these drug can be safely and effectively used in a resource-poor setting,” said Eric Goemaere, M.D., Head of Mission, MSF-South Africa. “We would like to expand this program to the treatment of adults, but we are blocked by high drug prices. We are doubtful that current approaches, including drug donations and vague promises of price reductions, will benefit our patients anytime soon. In contrast, if generics were available in South Africa, we could treat patients tomorrow.”
In the report, MSF challenges the international community to take immediate steps to bring antiretroviral prices down to levels that would be affordable to people in developing countries. The report states that through dramatically expanded generic production and bulk purchasing, the price of antiretroviral treatment could be reduced to as little as US$200 a year. This target price contrasts sharply to US$2,250 price that would result from the recently announced UNAIDS public-private partnership (85% reduction off the current global price of triple drug therapy of $15,000).
MSF cited the UN vaccine and contraceptive programs as models of what can be done when international organisations, national governments, and the drug industry work together to dramatically increase access to essential medical interventions in poor countries. These efforts have created dramatic price differentials between developing countries and wealthier nations: oral contraceptives cost US$0.14-0.23 per month through the UN and US$30 in the United States.
When countries are barred from accessing low cost drugs due to the exclusive marketing rights of the patent holder, international organizations should actively support the efforts of developing countries to improve access through parallel imports, and voluntary and compulsory licenses.
In addition, the report shows that justifications for high prices of originators’ branded products are overstated. Public investment in AIDS drugs has been significant: 5 out of 6 of the antiretrovirals analysed in the study received public funding and the patents for drugs (didanosine and stavudine) are held by public authorities.
“Differential pricing should not have a negative effect on research and development of new treatments, especially when you consider that Africa currently only represents one percent of the world-wide drug market,” said Daniel Berman, coordinator of MSF’s Access to Essential Medicines Campaign. “Companies can survive and prosper if prices are lower in poor countries. More importantly, millions of lives can be saved.”
Contact in Durban: Kris Torgeson, +27 (0)82-370-5307